This is beyond a joke, tried to play lethal difficulty today and of 9 attempts 8 of them had someone well below level 25. While I understand some people don’t mind trying to carry someone through it’s beyond crazy. 1 match I matched with a level 23 and a level 9 trying to do it. Am I just the unluckiest person in match making or is this a wide spread issue?

Definitely need to introduce a level cap for Sub and above. Was having difficult games yesterday and was starting to doubt if I got rusty after not playing for a couple of days. When I tab to see what people I got paired with they were level 1s trying to get carried on Ruthless. Bros didn't even know how to parry.

​

Draban wrote:

This is beyond a joke, tried to play lethal difficulty today and of 9 attempts 8 of them had someone well below level 25. While I understand some people don’t mind trying to carry someone through it’s beyond crazy. 1 match I matched with a level 23 and a level 9 trying to do it. Am I just the unluckiest person in match making or is this a wide spread issue?

This is just facts... They need level caps so bad. Had a level 3 join a ruthless... Its ridiculous that this is not a thing yet.

As Lethal is specifically made as end game content it should have a level 25 cap on it. You should only be able to play below that if you are playing in a group with friends. Sure there are people below level 25 who have the skills to play at that difficulty, but as most people don't it causes a problem.

You know you can combine with another play to kick someone from the group, right?

​

gr4v3dgr wrote:

You know you can combine with another play to kick someone from the group, right?

yeah I usually do start a vote to remove but am yet to have success with it.

I agree with having some kind of level cap.  But skill is more important then level. I played a Lethal with randoms last week and the Tactical was only lv 13. He didnt do as much damage as me or the other guy but he pulled his weight for sure and contributed to the team effort. Maybe lv 20 is good for Lethal. I don't think ruthless needs any cap (maybe lv 10?) since it's a pretty chill game mode, pretty easy to make a come back and death times are not so long. I just HATE the 5 min death time on lethal. Best to just quit the match if you die with a mortal wound or you will really sabotage the game for your team-mates.

Well, I don`t mind people low level dropping in a heigher diffulty op, it is a way of experiencing the... you know, with respect, you could creat a private lobby for that. 

game is trash, not enough people playing to properly run any level matching or matchmaker

go play another game​

​

gr4v3dgr wrote:
v 11, 2024, 2:24:22 AM Copied to clipboard!

You know you can combine with another play to kick someone from the group, right?

Sadly they could also do the same and kick you out too.

​

nikof135 wrote:

go play another game​

Go deep throat the extremely average game some more. That'll definitely make sure it never improves.

​

SamSlade wrote:

game is trash, not enough people playing to properly run any level matching or matchmaker

Never had this problem... Also why play a trash game??

​

Viktor_Johansson wrote:

​

SamSlade wrote:

game is trash, not enough people playing to properly run any level matching or matchmaker

Never had this problem... Also why play a trash game??

I was thinking the same thing, also why waste time on the forums of a game you hate….

​

Draban wrote:

​

Viktor_Johansson wrote:

​

SamSlade wrote:

game is trash, not enough people playing to properly run any level matching or matchmaker

Never had this problem... Also why play a trash game??

I was thinking the same thing, also why waste time on the forums of a game you hate….

​In the same way that I advocate for a rework of certain mechanics and a better accessibility of lower difficulty levels, I agree that difficulty levels should only be unlocked from a certain level, especially the fifth and last.

I hope that the player rank system will correct this, because the most demanding players should not be bothered by "tourists" who try their luck at the expense of others.

When I decide to level up a class, I start at the lowest level and progress little by little (it is not that time-consuming). First, because I do not necessarily master the class in question, and also because I have not yet found good affinities with certain weapon combinations. I prefer to avoid being a burden for others in the higher difficulty levels; it is a form of necessary preparation before venturing there. An exception could be private games, where this would be done with the consent of others for various reasons.

Then, class skills are essential, especially those that impact the squad, and they are not all equal. If the basic skills are not even unlocked, you might as well play with AI bots. Frankly, landing unprepared in the highest difficulty levels, in public games, is something I do not appreciate either, especially when I see that some do not follow on the field.

A high does not guarantee good team spirit or exceptional skills, but it is a sign of necessary involvement before tackling the highest difficulty levels. If it is not obvious to the majority, then it should be supervised to limit abuse.

I vote for it.

​

​

Viktor_Johansson wrote:

​

SamSlade wrote:

game is trash, not enough people playing to properly run any level matching or matchmaker

Never had this problem... Also why play a trash game??

I'm not,  i just drop back to see if they're getting any better... they're not