https://redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/International_Services/International_Humanitarian_Law/IHL_SummaryGenevaConv.pdf

https://www.redcross.ca/about-us/about-the-canadian-red-cross/red-cross-emblem/it-may-just-be-a-game-to-you-but-it-means-the-world-to-us

https://esportslegal.news/2023/11/11/good-to-know-navigating-the-legalities-of-the-red-cross-symbol-in-video-gaming/

THE Red Cross dont care if it in a derivative  shape of the black Templars 

If the symbol is red and the player is attempting to and an white background disabled it from happening. 

Too manner people have mememed or troll me about this I'm serous the balck Templar can be turned into red and be placed on a white background the symbol is protected and bound by the Geneva Convention. It is not in the public domain or in free use.

The updated black Templar symbolthat has the skull added is perfectly fine but directly a red cross on a white background is not.

Besides this is the greek cross. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/706 .

​

Shining_Darkness wrote:
What are you on about? Also your relied to your own post dude just edit it if you had more to say.

It is sad to see an ancient's mind decay inside of a dreadnought, brother. ​

​

williamcaw wrote:

 bound by the Geneva Convention. 

The Geneva Suggestions are not followed in the grimdark future of the 41st millennium. 

whats the point of this post and the post you made on the steam forums? did babby not get enough attention on the steam forums?

​

Realmonster wrote:

whats the point of this post and the post you made on the steam forums? did babby not get enough attention on the steam forums?

Truly a mystery for the ages, brother.