When the actual votes matter they put a note saying the points are not what is being looked at. The voting system is fine. For stuff the community posts it makes sense for them to listen to the people with the most points since those people by virtue of higher point count are clearly far more invested in Focus products and are thus the people they want to keep happy. 

​

Shining_Darkness wrote:

When the actual votes matter they put a note saying the points are not what is being looked at. The voting system is fine. For stuff the community posts it makes sense for them to listen to the people with the most points since those people by virtue of higher point count are clearly far more invested in Focus products and are thus the people they want to keep happy. 

That makes sense.

​

Selphic wrote:

​

Shining_Darkness wrote:

When the actual votes matter they put a note saying the points are not what is being looked at. The voting system is fine. For stuff the community posts it makes sense for them to listen to the people with the most points since those people by virtue of higher point count are clearly far more invested in Focus products and are thus the people they want to keep happy. 

That makes sense.

Is it though? Just because someone bought their way out doesn't mean they understand better or have better ideas. I see people with high g2g points make stupid shit as I see people with low g2g count having a good ideas but being drowned in the see of "more invested" crowd. Those point should have brag only factor and shouldn't affect on how important the opinion looks. 

Simple example: you can have a lot of points from other games which won't make you understand problems of this game better and vice versa. For dev voting it does make sense but not for how ideas are handled here. 

​

AshySamurai wrote:

​

Selphic wrote:

​

Shining_Darkness wrote:

When the actual votes matter they put a note saying the points are not what is being looked at. The voting system is fine. For stuff the community posts it makes sense for them to listen to the people with the most points since those people by virtue of higher point count are clearly far more invested in Focus products and are thus the people they want to keep happy. 

That makes sense.

Is it though? Just because someone bought their way out doesn't mean they understand better or have better ideas. I see people with high g2g points make stupid shit as I see people with low g2g count having a good ideas but being drowned in the see of "more invested" crowd. Those point should have brag only factor and shouldn't affect on how important the opinion looks. 

Simple example: you can have a lot of points from other games which won't make you understand problems of this game better and vice versa. For dev voting it does make sense but not for how ideas are handled here. 

This is a FOCUS website, like I said when Saber takes votes they indicate when they are not looking at the points but the number of votes. Like in that multi-poll for the direction Absolute should take. The yes/no votes there were a vote count not a point count.

It is just a number, don't let it bother you so much. (I am, of course, using the royal 'you' here, not you specifically)