​why are squad subordinates allowed to kick their leader? why does the squad leader need a permission form a subordinate to kick other subordinate? that's the most stupid thing i've ever seen

Being the game host (squad leader) does not make you their supervisor and does not make them your subordinates. 

What would be stupid is only allowing the host to kick people.

​

Tatoskok wrote:

Being the game host (squad leader) does not make you their supervisor and does not make them your subordinates. 

you are correct, host is more than some supervisor. host is the OWNER of the lobby. call the rest subordinates or not, but they are not host's equal. how stupid is it that they can kick the host?

​

Kaphik wrote:

What would be stupid is only allowing the host to kick people.

so to you the most intelligent solution seems stupid? that says a lot​

​

Brother_Phobos wrote:

​

Kaphik wrote:

What would be stupid is only allowing the host to kick people.

so to you the most intelligent solution seems stupid? that says a lot​

Your "solution" isnt a solution to any problem and its certainly not intelligent. Lets go with a few examples.

What if the host is abusive and intentionally trying to ruin the run for the other two people? They have to quit while the host gets the benefit of the progress so far?

What if the host refuses to kick someone else who is intentionally being abusive or sabotaging the group?

What happens if the host decides to go afk for tacos or something during the run?

There's a valid reason why anyone can initiate a kick.

Your "problem" doesn't exist. Unless one has some sort of weird superiority fetish about hosting.

​

Kaphik wrote:

Your "problem" doesn't exist. Unless one has some sort of weird superiority fetish about hosting.

it does exist, and if you think, it has nothing to do with any fetish, and everything to do with lobby ownership